Legal Opinion
Lundgren v. Converse
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 1939No. Civ. 12206; Civ. 12205PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, Acting P. J.
This litigation arose from an automobile accident which occurred at the intersection of Santa Anita Avenue and Blanche Street in the city of Pasadena on the 23d day of December, 1937, at about 5:30 P. M. Respondent, Charles J. Lundgren, accompanied by his wife, was driving in a westerly direction on Blanche Street. Appellant Hazel M. Converse was driving her automobile in a southerly direction on Santa Anita Avenue and was accompanied by appellants Gertrude M. Converse and Flora Converse as well as by two other persons not parties to the litigation.
At the time of the accident it was dark and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Keyes v. HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Ritchey v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Wynne v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Robinson v. ClemonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Traynor v. McGilvrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Malinson v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Breland v. Traylor Engineering & Manufacturing, Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Guerra v. BalestrieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- United States v. UarteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Jennings v. ArataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.