Legal Opinion

Gault v. Freitas

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1955No. Civ. No. 8574PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

This is an appeal from the order granting a new trial in a personal injury action. The grounds of the order were errors in law occurring at the trial and insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendant. The sole question urged on appeal, however, is that plaintiff-respondent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Appellants concede that their appeal is without merit if respondent’s conduct was such as to leave the issue of contributory negligence to be solved by the jury as a question of fact.

The accident out of which this action arose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Senegram v. GroobmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Fugelsang v. SteinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Mytinger v. WeirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bethke v. Idaho Sav. & Loan AssociationIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Bethke v. Idaho Sav. & Loan AssociationIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API