Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Koyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1934No. Civ. No. 9304PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries suffered in an automobile collision. The trial *488court made findings in favor of the plaintiff and from the judgment entered thereon the defendant Koyer has appealed.

Third Street in Los Angeles runs east and west. Gramercy Place runs north and south and intersects Third Street at right angles. On the east side of Gramercy, Third Street has considerable grade up toward St. Andrews. The southeast corner of Gramercy and Third consists of elevated ground on which the trees and buildings are so located that the view of the drivers of vehicles is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Keyes v. HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Page v. MazzeiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Crabbe v. RhoadesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Kienlen v. HoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Carbaugh v. White Bus LineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bramble v. McEwanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Hopping v. City of Redwood CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Avalos v. GrimaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Senegram v. GroobmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Theren v. HodorowiczCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API