Legal Opinion

Walcrath Realty Co. v. Van Dyke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1933No. Docket No. 70, Calendar No. 36,929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

The action is at law to recover instalments due on a land contract. Defendant pleaded rescission for fraud, with cross-declaration for return of moneys paid. Plaintiff had judgment in justice’s court, but defendant recovered payments made on jury trial in circuit court. Plaintiff’s motions for directed verdict and for judgment non obstante were denied.

Defendant claims that, at the time of purchase, plaintiff represented it had title under warranty deed, and she relied on the representations. About a year before suit she heard plaintiff did not have title but was making payments for the land,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steele v. BanningaMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Lackovic v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Lightner v. KarnatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Silfver v. DaenzerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Allen v. TalbotMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federici Et Ux v. LehmanOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bonninghausen v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Thomas v. ReeceMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Stover v. WhitingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API