Legal Opinion

Bonninghausen v. Hall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 132, Calendar No. 37,681PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

In December, 1930, plaintiffs acquired by assignment the vendee’s interest in a land contract dated October 26, 1923. There had been one previous assignment of this interest. Defendant herein was the vendor. The contract covered Detroit real estate, recited a purchase price of $12,000, down payment $2,500, and provided payment of balance in monthly instalments. When plaintiffs purchased the vendee’s interest there was still unpaid on the contract price approximately $4,700. Plaintiffs defaulted in making payments. In 1932 notice of forfeiture was served. Forthwith plaintiffs filed the. bill…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Amster v. StrattonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hyman v. BoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Baughan v. Mortgage & Contract Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Adadow v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. BushmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pungs v. HilgendorfMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bechard v. BoltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Probst v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Pungs v. HilgendorfMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API