Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Reece

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1952No. Docket 43, Calendar 45,396PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtishnell, J.

Plaintiff Thomas, on December 17, 1945, entered into a land contract for the purchase of a vacant lot in the village of Inkster from defendants Reece and paid $350 thereon. She completed the payment of her contract price of $1,200 on June 2, 1949 and demanded a warranty deed. Defendants were unable to deliver the deed because they had lost their title through a tax sale. On several occasions thereafter Mrs. Thomas made further demands, and finally made a formal demand by registered letter.

Action was begun in the common pleas court for the city of Detroit for the damages she had suffered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Way v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Lackovic v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Lightner v. KarnatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Wasylux v. LubienskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Duncombe v. TrombleMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barkho v. Homecomings Financial, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  2. Frank v. Kiesel (In re Denison)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API