Legal Opinion

Semi-Tropic Spiritualists' Ass'n v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1912No. L.A. No. 2913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered against him and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The cause was tried before a referee and his findings were adopted by the court. By stipulation the transcript of the testimony taken before the court commissioner was used as a statement of the case on defendant’s motion for a new trial. As the procedure followed was that provided by sections 953a et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure, no printed transcript has been filed, but appellant preserves certain parts of the testimony in his brief.

The principal controversy is waged over the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matteson v. WagonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Amestoy v. Elec. Rapid Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Buckley v. AlthorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Haseltine v. HaseltineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Medina v. Van Camp Sea Food Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Harvey v. City of HoltvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API