State Ex Rel. Pennock v. Coe
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
This is an original proceeding in mandar mus to compel the secretary of state to accept for filing the necessary documents tendered by relator for the referendum of §§ 7 and 36 of chapter 174, Laws of 1953, pp. 346, 367.
Relator in his application for the writ alleges full compliance with the statutory and constitutional requirements to entitle his committee of legal voters to seek such referendum, and that respondent refused to accept for filing the documents tendered because chapter 174 contained an emergency clause which provided it should take effect April 1, 1953.
Relator then asserts:
“. .…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Blakeslee v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Senior Citizens League, Inc. v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Jensen v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- CLEAN v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Hoppe v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.