Legal Opinion

Just v. City of Lebanon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 2004No. 2003-043; A122516PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

This judicial review is one of five concerning the City of Lebanon’s decisions to annex several pieces of property and to apply particular zoning designations to those properties. James Just appealed four of the annexation and zoning decisions to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), and Friends of Linn County appealed the fifth. In each of the five cases, LUBA remanded the annexation and zoning designation because it concluded that the city had failed to meet certain annexation criteria in its comprehensive plan. Although each of the city’s decisions concerned a different piece of property,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Lincoln Loan Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Just v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Just v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Just v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Siporen v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Friends of Linn County v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Just v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API