Legal Opinion
City of San Jose v. Great Oaks Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 1987No. Docket Nos. A027584, A031079PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
The City of San Jose (City) appeals from a trial court grant of summary judgment, dismissal and award of attorney’s fees entered in favor of respondent Great Oaks Water Company (Great Oaks). This action concerns the exercise of the right to provide water service within a portion of the San Jose water service area known as the “Expanded Edenvale Redevelopment Area, Phase I” (Edenvale Area). We affirm.
I
The plan for the Edenvale Area project was adopted by the City’s Redevelopment Agency in or about August 1981. The plan provided for the industrial development of a southern…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Rural Landowners Assn. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Toso v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Mira Monte Homeowners Assn. v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Stevens v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- McQueen v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority v. HenslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Fund for Environmental Defense v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Melamed v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.