Legal Opinion

Stevens v. City of Glendale

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1981No. Civ. 60299PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SHELDON, J. *

Richard P. Stevens and Chevy Chase Estates Association were the petitioners below and are the appellants. City of Glendale, Glendale City Council and individual members thereof are the respondents. Hensler-MacDonald, a joint venture, is the real party in interest (RPI).

Appellants filed a petition for writ of mandate and alternative writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1085 wherein they sought to challenge the legal sufficiency of the City of Glendale’s general plan and the housing element contained therein. In addition, pursuant to Code of Civil…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. O'Loane v. O'RourkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Bownds v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Laurel Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sacramento Old City Ass'n v. City Council of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Bowman v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Twain Harte Homeowners Ass'n v. County of TuolumneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API