Legal Opinion

Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Productization, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 11, 1994No. 15051-4-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C.J.

Productization, Inc., appeals a superior court order denying its motion to compel arbitration. We affirm.

Productization is a Kansas corporation. Pope & Talbot, Inc., is a Delaware corporation. At the times material here, neither was registered as a contractor.

In 1989, Productization and Pope entered into a contract under which Productization was to "construct on a 'turnkey’ basis a complete wood waste fuel refinery”. Productization was to dismantle a "pellet plant” 2 in Florida, ship it to Washington, and reconstruct it on land owned by Pope.

Article 16 of the contract contained an arbitration…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. Board of Yakima County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Pedersen v. KlinkertWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Stewart Carpet Service, Inc. v. Contractors Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. International Commercial Collectors, Inc. v. CarverWashington Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Arctic Stone, Ltd. v. DadvarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Arctic Stone, Ltd. v. DadvarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Davidson v. HensenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API