Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Productization, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C.J.
Productization, Inc., appeals a superior court order denying its motion to compel arbitration. We affirm.
Productization is a Kansas corporation. Pope & Talbot, Inc., is a Delaware corporation. At the times material here, neither was registered as a contractor.
In 1989, Productization and Pope entered into a contract under which Productization was to "construct on a 'turnkey’ basis a complete wood waste fuel refinery”. Productization was to dismantle a "pellet plant” 2 in Florida, ship it to Washington, and reconstruct it on land owned by Pope.
Article 16 of the contract contained an arbitration…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. Board of Yakima County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Pedersen v. KlinkertWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Stewart Carpet Service, Inc. v. Contractors Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- International Commercial Collectors, Inc. v. CarverWashington Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Arctic Stone, Ltd. v. DadvarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Arctic Stone, Ltd. v. DadvarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Davidson v. HensenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.