Legal Opinion

International Commercial Collectors, Inc. v. Carver

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1983No. 48675-1, 48686-7PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDimmick, J.

We here interpret sections of the Registration of Contractors Act, RCW 18.27, to determine who are the beneficiaries of a contractor's surety bond. The trial court held that consumers alone were protected by a surety bond. We reverse and hold that the legislative statement that the act protects "the public" does not change the beneficiaries specified in the act.

Appellant, Van Daal, Inc., a construction materials supplier, sold materials to R. W. Allen. Allen was a registered contractor under RCW 18.27. Respondent, Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company (CBIC), issued a statutorily required…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Leonard v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Jenkins v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. U. S. Oil & Refining Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. In Re Chi-Dooh LiWashington Supreme Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. COSMOPOLITAN ENG. GROUP v. Ondeo Degremont, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cosmopolitan Engineering Group, Inc. v. Ondeo Degremont, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. BAINBRIDGE POLICE GUILD v. City of PuyallupWashington Supreme Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API