Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Hensen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 21, 1997No. 19848-7-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Bruce Hensen contracted to build a house for Samuel and Elizabeth Davidson. Disputes arose, and Hensen sought arbitration pursuant to the contract. After the close of evidence in the arbitration hearing, the Davidsons learned that Hensen’s contractor registration and security bond may have lapsed. The arbitrator refused to consider any additional evidence and rendered an award for Hensen. Hensen then petitioned the Superior Court to confirm the award and the Davidsons objected, arguing that RCW 18.27.080 bars unregistered contractors from maintaining a court action to collect compensation.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barnett v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Boyd v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Northern State Construction Co. v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Wise v. RadisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hanson v. ShimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API