Legal Opinion
Pendergast v. Yandes
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1890No. 15,602PublishedCited by 14 opinions
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.
The appellee was duly appointed and qualified as receiver of the Broad Ripple Natural Gas Company, a corporation organized for the purpose of supplying consumers with natural gas.
After his appointment the appellant filed the claim now in dispute, and sought to have the same allowed and paid as a preferred claim. The cause was tried by the court, which made a special finding of the facts in the cause and stated its conclusions of law thereon.
It appears from this special finding that the Broad Ripple Natural Gas Company is a corporation organized under the laws of this State for the purpose of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gurney v. Atlantic & Great Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Mining Co. v. CullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Stryker v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Capron v. StroutNevada Supreme Court · 1876
- Knight v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re RaynesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Bell v. HinerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Jenckes v. JenckesIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Kritzer v. Tracy Engineering Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Aurora National Bank v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.