Legal Opinion

Bell v. Hiner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1896No. 1,908PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

-On October 25,1894, one Jasper was engaged in keeping a livery stable at Ft. Wayne. At this time and prior thereto, one Bell held a mortgage on the property used by Jasper in said business, viz: certain horses, carriages, etc., “and all other chattels belonging to the said Jasper in said barn” to secure $1,000.00, this being more than the value of the property. Jasper being upon that day insolvent, threatened with suit and pressed for payment by Bell and unable to meet his liabilities, at his request conveyed to Bell all of said property in payment of said debt, and his business was on said…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Provident Institution for Savings v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Hancock v. YadenIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Robinson v. RippeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Warren v. SohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Western Assurance Co. v. McAlpinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. McDaniel v. OsbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Board of Commissioners v. CroneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Heckman v. TammenIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Seymour v. BergIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API