Legal Opinion

Sharp Electronics Corp. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 18, 2009No. 08-2959PublishedCited by 197 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Circuit Judge.

From 1997 until April 2, 2002, Sandra Rudzinski worked for Sharp Electronics Corporation. As a full-time employee, she was entitled to participate in a long-term group disability plan (the “Plan”), which was underwritten by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”). The present controversy arose out of a lawsuit between Rudzinski and MetLife. Briefly, after Rudzinski stopped working for Sharp, she applied for a conversion policy with MetLife to preserve her long-term disability coverage. MetLife denied her application. Rudzinski responded with a suit in federal court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by197 opinions

  1. RWJ Management Co. v. BP Products North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Christopher Coleman v. City of Peoria, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Louis Bianchi v. Thomas McQueenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Miller v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Doe-2 v. McLean County Unit District No. 5 Board of DirectorsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API