Legal Opinion
Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 4, 2009No. 07-1437PublishedCited by 1,307 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
In this case, we decide whether a federal court of appeals has jurisdiction to review a district court’s order that remands a case to state court after declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims under 28 U. S. C. § 1867(c). The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that appellate review of such an order is barred by § 1447(d) because it viewed the remand order in this case as resting on the District Court’s lack of subject-matter jurisdiction over the state-law claims. We disagree and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
I
In 2005, respondents filed a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,307 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hukic v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Koch v. City of Del CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- John Delaney v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Crest Construction II, Inc. v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
1,302 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.