Legal Opinion

Lally v. Crookston Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 1901No. Nos. 12,349—(78)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in the district court for Polk county to recover $10,000 damages for personal injuries. The case was tried before Watts, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in 'favor of plaintiff for $5,000. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The gist of the complaint is that plaintiff was operating a circular saw in defendant’s sawmill, and was clipping shingles thereon; that the place furnished him to stand in was dangerous, because the shingles, coming down from a floor above through a spout, had a tendency to fall upon the saw and be thrown about; that the saw was unguarded; that plaintiff remained in the dangerous place and operated the saw upon defendant’s promise to protect it by putting up a guard; that defendant did not so protect the saw as promised; and that, while at work, shingles, having accumulated, dropped upon the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morse v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Anderson v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Anderson v. H. C. Akeley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Scharenbroich v. St. Cloud Fiber-Ware Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Day v. H. C. Akeley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glockner v. Hardwood Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Syverson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Hermann v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Reid v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Whitney v. KaliskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API