Legal Opinion

Syverson v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1955No. 36,560PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This is an action in tort by plaintiff, Balph Syverson, to recover for personal injuries suffered May 21, 1953, while working on the farm of the defendant, Clifford H. Nelson, the injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of defendant-employer. Upon the completion of plaintiff’s evidence, defendant moved for a directed verdict on the. ground that there had been an assumption of the risk involved by the plaintiff and that this appeared conclusively from plaintiff’s own evidence. The court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and plaintiff thereafter moved the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Blomberg v. TrupukkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. McGowan v. La Plata Mining & Smelting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1882
  5. O'Niel v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Peterson v. WT Rawleigh CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Bigham v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Knutson v. Arrigoni Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Geis v. HodgmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Rausch v. Julius B. Nelson and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API