Legal Opinion

Anderson v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1896No. Nos. 10,284—(158)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Carlton county, Morris, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $4,000, which was reduced with his consent to $3,000.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action was brought to recover for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant. The plaintiff was employed as a knot sawyer or shingle grader in the *80shingle department of defendant's sawmill. The shingle department was on the ground floor of the mill, and the sawyers stood on a raised platform, the floor of which was about four feet above the floor of the mill. The saws were set in a frame or table, on shafts or arbors raised about three feet, or to the height of a man’s waist, above and at the side of and parallel with this platform. There were five saws, in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Maley v. South Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Knisley v. . PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Huntington v. . AttrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Denver & R. G. R. Co. v. NorgateCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Suess v. Arrowhead Steel Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Dusha v. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Erickson v. Van Web Equipment CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API