Legal Opinion

Anderson v. H. C. Akeley Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 24, 1891PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county,' Smith, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $2,000 for plaintiff in an action for a personal injury.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

While the plaintiff was engaged as a servant of the-defendant in operating a planing-machine in its mill, a large leather-belt, by which the machine was driven, parted at the place where the ends of the leather strip were united to form the belt, and struck the plaintiff’s elbow, causing an injury for which this action is prosecuted. The defendant is charged with liability for negligence in respect to the fastening of the belt above referred to, the alleged fault being not in the method employed, but that the fastening had been allowed to-become and to remain insecure. We have come to the…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Reed v. StockmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  3. Erdman v. Illinois Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Week v. Fremont Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API