Reid v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.
Plaintiff, a passenger on a street car, in descending to the street, stepped on a bulge or hump two to five inches high in a creosote block paving which was covered by over two inches of snow. She fell and was seriously injured. It is claimed that defendant was negligent in failing to select a safe place for plaintiff to alight.
The street railway company, like any common carrier of passengers, must exercise the highest degree of care — commensurate with the practical management and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morse v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Ruddy v. IngebretSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Lally v. Crookston Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Whitney v. KaliskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Lentz v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Gillson v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Staloch v. BelsaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Shepard v. Denver Tramway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Knapp v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.