Legal Opinion

Reid v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1927No. 25,936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

Plaintiff, a passenger on a street car, in descending to the street, stepped on a bulge or hump two to five inches high in a creosote block paving which was covered by over two inches of snow. She fell and was seriously injured. It is claimed that defendant was negligent in failing to select a safe place for plaintiff to alight.

The street railway company, like any common carrier of passengers, must exercise the highest degree of care — commensurate with the practical management and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morse v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Ruddy v. IngebretSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Lally v. Crookston Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Whitney v. KaliskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Lentz v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Gillson v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Staloch v. BelsaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Shepard v. Denver Tramway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  5. Knapp v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API