Legal Opinion

Gallo v. J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1984No. 2185PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

The appellant, Concetta Gallo, commenced an action in trespass and assumpsit against appellee, J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Company, to recover No-Fault benefits to which she claims entitlement by reason of injuries sustained as a passenger in a snowmobile involved in an accident. The Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County, per the Honorable Franklin S. Van Antwerpen, granted the appellee’s motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that a snowmobile is not a motor vehicle as defined by the policy and by the No-Fault Act. 1 The court concluded that because a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Habecker v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Karns v. Tony Vitale Fireworks Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. DiAndrea v. Reliance Savings & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Del Quadro v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Vogel v. BerkleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Kelly v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Jones v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Gallo v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Consulting Engineers, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API