Masland v. Bachman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
The question presented in this appeal1 is whether the regulation promulgated by the Pennsylvania Department of Health (Department) subjecting office laboratories of private physicians to regulation under the Clinical Laboratory Act2 (the Act) is a valid exercise of the Department’s rule-making power.
The Act provides that “clinical laboratories” are subject to regulation by the Department. Section 2152 of the Act defines a “clinical laboratory” as “any place, establishment or institution organized and operated primarily for the performance of all or any…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. TrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Meier v. MaleskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Turner v. May Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Habecker v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.