Legal Opinion

Township of Superior v. Reimel Sign Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1961No. Docket 32, Calendar 48,434PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

In this case plaintiff township by bill of complaint in equity seeks to enforce its zoning ordinance against defendant sign company which painted a large advertising sign on a barn under lease from defendant Bernard. The defenses presented below and here are that the ordinance did not forbid this sign, and that anyway it was unconstitutional.

The facts were stipulated and we quote the relevant portions:

“1. That plaintiff is an unchartered township, legally organized as a municipal corporation existing and acting under and by authority of the Constitution and statutes of the State of Michigan.
“2…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. Wolverine Sign Works v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Straith v. StraithMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. FerrierNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co. v. LiddleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. O'Brien v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Township of Farmington v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Adams Outdoor Advertising v. East LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API