O'Brien v. State Highway Commissioner

The immediate judgment of the Court is that a restrictive preface should introduce the ensuing opinion. Our purpose is that of making outset-clear what is not involved in the cases at bar, and that of "comparing in a provisional way what is *548not involved with what may be involved in some corresponding future case. The comparison should assist the legislature as that body considers two currently introduced bills to “regulate” roadside advertising devices, and another to “limit” control by the State highway department of trunkline rights-of-way.1

The legislature of Michigan has not as yet dubbed…