Guardians v. Wells
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Justice.
¶ 1 The State Land Commissioner (Commissioner) denied the applications of Forest Guardians and Jonathan Tate (collectively Plaintiffs), who were the highest bidders for grazing leases on three parcels of land that are part of the state’s school land trust, which is administered by the State Land Department (Department). That denial was premised on the conclusion that the statutory scheme did not permit the issuance of grazing leases for the purpose of restoring the land. The trial court affirmed on review of the agency decision, as did the court of appeals. We granted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Murphy v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- County of Skamania v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Scottsdale Healthcare, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System AdministrationArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Webb v. GittlenArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Cornman Tweedy 560, LLC v. City of Casa GrandeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- State v. Arizona Navigable Stream Adjudication CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.