Legal Opinion

County of Skamania v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1984No. 49799-1PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment holding unconstitutional the Forest Products Industry Recovery Act of 1982. The main issue is whether the Act, by modifying contracts for the sale of timber from trust lands, violated the State's fiduciary duties to the trust beneficiaries. The trial court held that it did; we affirm.

I

A. Facts

This case concerns the sale of timber from state lands. Of the 18 million acres of commercial timberland in Washington, approximately 10 percent is held by the State of Washington in trust for various beneficiaries. The bulk of this land was granted to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lassen v. Arizona Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Shea v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Allard v. Pacific National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Ervien v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. State v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Plateau Mining Co. v. Utah Division of State Lands & ForestryUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Department of State Lands v. PettiboneMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. Board of State LandsUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. GRANITE BEACH HOLDINGS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API