Legal Opinion

BIXLER BY BIXLER v. Avondale Mills

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1987No. C9-86-2049PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant Duane Bixler was severely burned in 1969 when his homemade cotton flannelette night shirt ignited, and he received settlements from the retailer and from one textile mill that may have manufactured the fabric. This appeal is from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of four other textile mills named as possible manufacturers of the fabric. We. affirm.

FACTS

The complete procedural history of this case is set forth in Bixler by Bixler v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc., 376 N.W.2d 209 (Minn.1985). To summarize, Duane Bixler, then five years old, was severely…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Mason v. Spiegel, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
  5. Dollander v. Rochester State HospitalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Ppg Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Mensing v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API