Legal Opinion

Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 25, 1988No. 85—0633, 85—0880 consPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley

The present consolidated appeal arises out of a pharmaceutical product liability action brought by plaintiff against various drug companies seeking recovery for injuries allegedly caused by her mother’s ingestion of diethylstilbestrol (DES). The trial court granted the drug companies’ joint motion for summary judgment as to counts I through IX of plaintiff’s second-amended complaint, but denied the motion as to count X alleging a strict liability cause of action based upon the market share theory. Other companies were granted summary judgment on all counts of the complaint as they were…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. George Harper and Robert Padilla v. Lieutenant AlbertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Shackil v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. Penelope Krist v. Eli Lilly and Company v. Abbott Laboratories, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API