Legal Opinion

Safie Manufacturing Co. v. Arnold

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1947PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

It is appropriate to note, in summary, that the contempt proceeding against respondents, appellants in this Court, arises out of a principal action in which Superior Court judges, presiding over Superior Courts of Richmond County, courts of competent jurisdiction, successively issued three injunctive orders for the purpose of protecting persons who desired to work, and who had a right to work, if-they so desired, in plaintiff’s plant. And while the orders are by their terms temporary and effective only until final trial of the cause, they are lawful orders of a court of competent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. In Re DeatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. State v. . RitterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. SummerlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Tarrytown Center, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Hart Cotton Mills, Inc. v. AbramsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. ERWIN MILLS v. Textile Workers Union of America, CIOSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API