ERWIN MILLS v. Textile Workers Union of America, CIO
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.
The first assignment of error is based upon the exception to the ruling of the court below in overruling the defendants’ demurrer to the complaint. This exception is bottomed upon the contention of the appellants that plaintiff’s cause of action, if any, arises out of a labor dispute between tbe plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of textile products in interstate commerce, and its employees and their union, a labor organization. The defendants contend, therefore, that the allegations of the complaint are in substance to the effect that defendants by concerted action,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- International Union, U. A. W. A., A. F. of L., Local 232 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- International Union of United Automobile v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- INTERNATIONAL UNION, ETC. v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Tarrytown Center, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Erwin Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union, Local 246Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.