Legal Opinion

State v. . Ritter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 24, 1929PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.,

after, stating the case: The gist of a criminal conspiracy is the unlawful concurrence of two or more persons in a wicked scheme— the agreement to do an unlawful act or to do a lawful act in an unlawful way or by unlawful means — and it is said that the crime is complete without any overt act having been done to carry out the agreement. S. v. Van Pelt, 136 N. C., 633, 49 S. E., 177; S. v. Dalton, 168 N. C., 204; 83 S. E., 693; S. v. Trammell, 24 N. C., 379. “If two or more persons conspire to do a wrong, this conspiracy is an act ‘rendering the transaction a, crime/ without any.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. State v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. State v. Van PeltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. State v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. . WhitesideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API