Legal Opinion

Hart Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Abrams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1950No. 104PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

While the evidence consumes less than forty pages of the record, there are 243 assignments of error. However, many of them are not brought forward and discussed in the brief of appellants. Those that are preserved present four questions for consideration and decision: (1) Are the facts found by the court sufficient to support the judgment, and if so, (2) is there competent evidence sufficient to support the findings; (3) did the court admit incompetent evidence to the prejudice of the respondents; and (4) have the respondents purged themselves of any contempt on their part ?

A mere reading of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. . MaysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. State v. . HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Tarrytown Center, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Hart Cotton Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  4. Onslow County v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. ERWIN MILLS v. Textile Workers Union of America, CIOSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API