Legal Opinion

State v. Summerlin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1950No. 219PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

60 S.E.2d 322 (1950)

232 N.C. 333

STATE

v.

SUMMERLIN.

No. 219.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 7, 1950.

Attorney General Harry McMullan and Assistant Attorney General Ralph Moody for the State.

J. Faison Thomson, Paul B. Edmundson and N. W. Outlaw, all of Goldsboro, for defendant Summerlin.

DENNY, Justice.

The appealing defendant entered 16 exceptions to the admission of evidence bearing on the plans agreed upon by all the alleged conspirators to rob a gambling place at Snow Hill, and the reason why the plans were changed on the morning of November 9th, when it was agreed to rob the gamblers at…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. . WhitesideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. State v. CaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API