Legal Opinion

J. D. Richardson Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 8, 1950No. C. D. 1271PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LawreNCe, Judge:

The question for our determination bere is whether certain imported merchandise consisting of base castings and upright castings, designed for ultimate use as parts of so-called Mixmasters, was properly classified by the collector of customs as articles or wares not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of zinc, and assessed with duty at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 19.30 (19 U. S. C. §1001, par. 397).

Plaintiff makes the following alternative claims:

1. That the merchandise should be classified pursuant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schweitzer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  3. Columbia Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  4. Welte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  5. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James G. Wiley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API