Legal Opinion

James G. Wiley Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 13, 1969No. C.D. 3738PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Newman, Judge:

Presented for our determination is the proper tariff classification of merchandise described on the special customs invoice as “Racealigners.”

The collector classified the merchandise under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108, as articles of base metal, not specially provided for, and accordingly assessed duty at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem. Without conceding that the classification is incorrect, the Government alternatively claims that the merchandise is classifiable as “mathematical instruments” under paragraph 360 of the act, as modified…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  2. J. D. Richardson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  3. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  4. Peet & Powers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  5. Thorens, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leaf Brands, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. James G. Wiley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. James G. Wiley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API