Legal Opinion
Verner v. DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 13, 1950No. 17287PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
1. “The losing party to a judgment on general demurrer is given the option to sue out a direct bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment, or to have certified and filed exceptions pendente lite. If the latter course be followed, the ruling on demurrer becomes a pendente lite ruling which is reviewable only after the termination of the case, on exceptions taken to the final judgment rendered therein. Civil Code (1910), § 6138 [now Code, § 6-7011.” Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 (79 S. E. 841); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 823 (35 S. E. 2d, 149); Story v. City of Macon,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Durrence v. WatersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Smith v. BarksdaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Story v. City of MacOnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Simpson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roughton v. THIELE KAOLIN COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- City of East Point v. MintonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Cordele Sash, Door & Lumber Co. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Mitchell v. DeKalb County BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976