Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Simpson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 11, 1948No. 16365PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Groves, Justice.
1. While no motion has been made to dismiss the writ of error, although counsel for the defendant in error argues in his brief that such should be done, yet “where it appears that this court is with- • out jurisdiction to entertain the bill of exceptions, it can not properly do otherwise than to dismiss the writ of error upon its own motion.” Etheridge v. Henderson, 188 Ga. 189 (2) (3 S. E. 2d, 674).
No. 16365. October 11, 1948. Hattie B. Bell, for plaintiff in error. Edtoard F. Taylor, contra.
2. It appearing from the record that judgment was rendered for temporary alimony…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Durrence v. WatersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Etheridge v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Smith v. BarksdaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Kronstadt v. RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
3Cited by3 opinions
- Verner v. DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIASupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Shropshire v. BroomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Cordele Sash, Door & Lumber Co. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951