Legal Opinion

Roughton v. THIELE KAOLIN COMPANY

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 13, 1954No. 18653PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almand, Justice.

Hubert L. Roughton brought an action against Thiele Kaolin Company for damages and injunctive relief, claiming that the defendant, as an upper riparian owner, was polluting a stream of water flowing over the plaintiff’s property, thereby creating a continuing nuisance, to the damage and injury of the plaintiff. This court, in Roughton v. Thiele Kaolin Co., 209 Ga. 577 (74 S. E. 2d 844), held that the petition stated a cause of action for damages and injunctive relief. On March 27, 1953, on a hearing of the prayer for an interlocutory injunction, the court, after the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shoaf v. BlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Roughton v. THIELE KAOLIN COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. Verner v. DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIASupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Malcom v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shaheen v. G & G CORP.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Ammons v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Price v. EMPIRE LAND COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  4. Hutchins v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  5. Davidson Mineral Properties, Inc. v. Gifford-Hill & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API