Legal Opinion

City of East Point v. Minton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 8, 1951No. 17295PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) “Equity will not enjoin a criminal prosecution solely to prevent such a prosecution, but it will in any proper case, by injunction or otherwise, prevent injury or destruction of property.” Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. v. City of Columbus, 189 Ga. 458 (1), 464 (6 S. E. 2d, 320), and cases cited; City of Albany v. Lippitt, 191 Ga. 756 (1) (13 S. E. 2d, 807); Chandler v. City of Tifton, 206 Ga. 43 (4) (55 S. E. 2d, 568). The pleadings and evidence in the present case, showing that the defendants, in addition to making…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Patterson v. BeckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. City of Albany v. LippittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Peginis v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Anderson v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Atlanta Botanical Garden, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  2. Fulton County v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API