Legal Opinion
Barry v. Smith
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 21, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 67-274-JPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JULIAN, District Judge.
This is an action brought by a veteran against his employer contesting an alleged denial of full reemployment rights guaranteed by Section 8 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, former 50 U.S.C.App. § 808, recodified as 50 U.S.C.App. § 459 (hereinafter the “Act”). The United States Attorney appears for plaintiff pursuant to 50 U.S.C.App. § 459(d). The parties have submitted the case to the Court upon an agreed statement of facts and upon briefs.
The factual basis of plaintiff’s claim can be briefly stated. Plaintiff entered the employ of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Tilton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Accardi v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robert E. Morton v. Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Messina v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1970
- Carmine Palmarozzo v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Carmine Palmarozzo v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973