Legal Opinion

Bolton v. SCHIMMING

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1961PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries received in an automobile accident. The case proceeded to trial before a jury. After the plaintiff had rested his case in chief, the defendant John Schimming moved for an involuntary nonsuit; the motion was granted and the action as to this particular defendant was dismissed. From this ruling of the trial court, the plaintiff has appealed.

This action was brought by the plaintiff against John Schimming and William Schimming, who are father and son. John Schimming, the father, was not present in the automobile, driven by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Leppard v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Foster v. FarraOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Cockerham v. PottsOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. White v. KELLER ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kraxberger v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Stone-Fox, Inc. v. Vandehey Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Rushing v. PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Pesqueira v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Sheppard v. WeeklyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API