Haynes v. Rosenfield
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 2. Error from District Court, Pontotoc County; John L. Coffman, Judge. Action by R. E. Haynes against Louis Rosenfield et al. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion 'by
JARMAN, C.
On March 26, 1913, the defendant Rosenfield, being indebted to the Merchants & Planters National Bank of Ada, Olkla., hi the sum of $1,400, gave his note to the bank for said amount due and payable on November 15, 1913, and executed a mortgage on lot 14, block 92, of the city of Ada to secure said note, and said mortgage was filed for record in March, 1913. At the time the note and mortgage were given, Rosenfield executed to the bank a warranty deed to the real estate covered by said mortgage, and the consideration recited in the deed is $1,400, and said deed was filed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Bradbury v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Parmer v. ParmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Stoutz v. RouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Wagg v. HerbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moore v. BeverlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Doggett v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Gould v. McKillipWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
- Republic Financial Corp. v. MizeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Stallings v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942