Legal Opinion

Moore v. Beverlin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1939No. 28342PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

The purpose of this action is to have a deed, absolute in form, declared a mortgage. The plaintiffs, Elvin D. Moore and Mary E. Moore, were husband and wife, and the land involved was their homestead. After the death of Elvin D. Moore the action was revived and carried on by the administrator of his estate.

On January 13, 1925, plaintiffs borrowed $13,000 from defendant, Beverlin, and executed a mortgage to him covering the land in question as security for payment of the loan. On January 13, 1930, the loan was renewed in the sum of $14,000 to cover principal, defaulted interest, and unpaid…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wagg v. HerbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Shaner v. Rathdrum State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Plummer v. IlseWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Bradbury v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morrow Development Corp. v. American Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Alexander v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  3. Coursey v. FairchildSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Central Credit UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Speed v. FarissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API