Legal Opinion
Hall v. Doering
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 25, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-2203-KHVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
In their second amended complaint, pro se plaintiffs George Milam Hall and Mary Milam Hall, his mother, allege that defendants Steve Doering, Bernard J. Lickteig, Mike Lickteig, Steve Lickteig, Kathy Feuerbom and Terry J. Solander denied and conspired to deny their civil rights under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, violated and conspired to violate their rights under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [RICO], 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., and committed fraud, conspiracy to defraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent…
2Cases cited99 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brooks v. SaucedaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Matosantos Commercial Corp. v. Applebee's International, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Hall v. DoeringDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Nash Oil & Gas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Xiangyuan Zhu v. St. Francis Health CenterDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.