Legal Opinion
Hall v. Doering
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 25, 1998No. CIV. A. 97-2203-KHVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
In its Memorandum and Order (Doc. #200) entered January 5, 1998, the Court addressed the parties’ various motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (Doc. # 152) filed October 9, 1997. See Hall v. Doering, et. al, No. Civ.A97-2203-KHV, 1998 WL 58874 (D.Kan. January 6, 1998). As the case now stands, plaintiffs claim that Terry Solander denied and conspired to deny their constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and conspired to commit fraud; that Steve Doering denied and conspired to deny their constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Xiangyuan (Sue) Zhu v. Countrywide Realty, Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Xiangyuan (Sue) Zhu v. Countrywide Realty, Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Indy Lube Investments, L.L.C. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Staudinger v. Hoelscher, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001