Legal Opinion
Grand Boulevard Improvement Ass'n v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 7, 1982No. 81 C 1284, 80 C 4760PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PRENTICE H. MARSHALL, District Judge.
In these two separate actions plaintiffs, having successfully challenged certain administrative actions by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), have moved for an award of attorney’s fees against the federal government under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 5 U.S.C. § 504, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (Supp. IV 1980). While the cases raised separate issues on the merits, the attorney’s fees motions come to us at the same time and raise similar questions under the EAJA. In addition, the plaintiffs in both cases are…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Stanley Spencer v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Allen S. Berman v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Billy H. Ashburn and Faye F. Ashburn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Temp Tech Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Glick v. United States Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.