Legal Opinion

Moore v. Specialty Oil Tool Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1933No. Docket No. 634PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The appeal herein is presented by the defendant from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff: for the full amount demanded in the complaint. Since the appeal is taken on the judgment-roll alone it is conceded by defendant that, in accordance with the well-established rule, the court’s findings are conclusively presumed to be supported by the evidence produced during the trial (Ochoa v. McCush, 213 Cal. 426, 430 [2 Pac. (2d) 357]). Inspection of the findings and of the pleadings filed in the action impels us to the conclusion that the appeal from the judgment must fail. In connection with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Ochoa v. McCushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Alley v. McCabeIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Specialty Oil Tool Co. v. Ames.California Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Norris v. NorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Caminetti v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Fickett v. RauchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Laumann v. ConnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API